[TagCommons-WG] Async ESP game - collaborative photo tagging for JeromeDL
J. Trant
jtrant at archimuse.com
Tue Jun 5 06:14:19 PDT 2007
Sebastian,
It will be interesting to see if prompting for facets improves the
tags that you get in your application. In the proof-of-concept work
for steve.museum, the team at The Metropolitan Museum of Art found
that prompting for facets often produced 'forced' results, as
participants tried to fill in all the blanks: a favourite example
"foot washing time" for Time related to a painting with a New
Testament theme.
See http://www.archimuse.com/papers/steve-nrhm-0605preprint.pdf for a
pre-print of the article that reports the tests.
steve.museum is now running broader tests of tagging related to art.
Everyone's invited to drop by http://tagger.steve.museum -- sign up
for an account to help our research -- and Tag Art!
best,
jennifer
At 7:28 AM +0100 5/30/07, Sebastian Kruk wrote:
>Dear Tom, fellow group members,
>
>Together with my group we work on a modified version of the ESP game
>for JeromeDL, were users' tagging would be annealed over the time
>before it becomes "visible" (since in the low-interest community
>like DLs it might be hard to get a critical mass of users "to play"
>the classical ESP game).
>
>During his analysis, Maciej, who works on this module, suggested that
>we could actually support users in tagging by recognizing and
>suggesting types of tags identifying different features of the photo,
>such as "agent", "action", "object", "setting"=place (I would add
>"time" to this list).
>
>We are going to use tagcommons ontology for tagging and our java API
>(tagging-api in tagstreemaps project on sf.net) to capture the
>tagging process. I have identified, however, two issues we will need
>to address by extending the generic tagging ontology:
> * support for regions-of-interest - so that we can tag a part of
>an object, but the tagging can be inferred on the whole object
> * support for types of tagging identified by Maciej
>
>Do you maybe know of any similar activities, ontologies, etc that we
>could refer to; we do not want to reinvent the wheel but rather re-
>use existing solutions.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Sebastian
>
>_______________________________________________
>WG mailing list
>WG at tagcommons.org
>http://lists.tagcommons.org/listinfo.cgi/wg-tagcommons.org
--
__________
J. Trant jtrant at archimuse.com
Partner & Principal Consultant phone: +1 416 691 2516
Archives & Museum Informatics fax: +1 416 352 6025
158 Lee Ave, Toronto
Ontario M4E 2P3 Canada http://www.archimuse.com
__________
More information about the Wg
mailing list