[TagCommons-WG] PRIVACY QUESTION - PLEASE READ

[Tom Gruber]

Does anyone mind if we make the archives to the tagcommons working group
discussion public?  I've had some call for this, and it seems that we are a
group that doesn't need to hash out disagreements in private.  (People would
still need to be validated before being able to post.)

 

The consequence is that your identity as contributor, and your ideas, would
be available for anonymous Internet reading and discoverable by search.  If
you DO NOT want this to happen, please reply to me personally (reply to this
message).

 

The details:

 

You've seen the format of archives

http://lists.tagcommons.org/private.cgi/wg-tagcommons.org/2007-February/thre
ad.html

 

The mailman/pipermail software "hides" the email address of the sender using
the "name at domain" convention, so there are no @'s or mailto's for the
crawlers to grab your address. (Of course, any self-respecting address
crawler would have already worked around this, so it is not much
protection.)

 

Tom

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tagcommons.org/pipermail/wg-tagcommons.org/attachments/20070226/5ef502b5/attachment-0003.htm>