[TagCommons-WG] Use Cases for Sharing Tag Data
Bernard Vatant
bernard.vatant at mondeca.com
Wed Feb 21 02:17:23 PST 2007
Hi all
Taking the opportunity of Harry's remark on languages to introduce
myself in the debate.
First to say a non-native english speaker involved in many projects
dealing with multilingual resources (European Community, North Africa
and Asia so far, more to come ...) of course shares the concern of Harry
concerning multilingual tagging.
Actually seems to me that multilingualism is only an aspect of the issue
of binding/clustering/hubbing tags one might consider to have more or
less the same meaning. Forgive the loose vocabulary, I'm in fact not
very familiar with the tag universe [1], I happen to be in this list, I
guess, following exchanges with Tom at the time of his reference
publication [2], on the issue of tag identity. How to link various
representations of same/similar things/concept/subjects/referents is
really my favourite horse. My blog "the wheel and the hub" from which
the above post is extracted, is all about that stuff.
Some thinking outloud about it. Please tell if it's irrelevant to this
forum, since I have hard time to figure what is the borderline between
naming, categorization, whatever, and tagging. I don't want to raise any
debate about this, I agree with Tom there has been too much of it at
nauseum without clarification. So I will just push pragmatic questions,
and please feel free to say : this is in scope, this is not.
I just discover in a previous post here the notion of "tag bundle". Does
it make sense to use that techique to bind tags likely to be used for
the same data, in the same or different languages
e.g., "Château de Versailles" "Palais de Versailles" "Versailles Palace"
"Chateau of Versailles" "Palacio de Versalles" "Palácio de Versalles"
"Castillo de Versailles" etc ...
IOW does a notion of "synonym tags" or "equivalent tags" make sense, and
is it a particular case of bundling? I think sharing data needs
something along those lines anyway.
The tags of the above list are used on Flickr, say, but are also used as
resources title, such as Wikipedia articles. For example
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chateau_of_Versailles" redirects to
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_of_Versailles". To me it's like
saying that in en.Wikipedia context, "Chateau of Versailles" is
equivalent to "Palace of Versailles". It tags the same resource.
(Note en passant that if Flickr does not support multilingualism,
Wikipedia does)
Is not html <title> a kind of tagging avant la lettre, and does it makes
sense to include it in our reflexion?
That's all for the moment
Cheers
Bernard
[1]
http://universimmedia.blogspot.com/2006/12/classifying-is-hard-tagging-is-worse.html
[2] http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-of-folksonomy.htm
Harry Halpin a écrit :
> Also the "language" of the tag is also going to pop up in
> cross-appliation tag aggregation, and I think mapping to a common
> ontology could help us with this this problem. For example, what if I
> know both German and English (which I do), what if I want all resources
> about tags about Germany? Germans would tag that with "Deutschland".
>
> Furthermore, this would be a great use-case for seeing what taggers are
> doing in different language communities. Are the same tags used by
> people in Korea as in the USA?
>
> There's an interesting message on the microformat list-serv about
> multi-lingual tagging between Karl Dubost and Tantek Celik that's worth
> looking at [1].
>
> And how the lack of a non-English user-interface on Flickr leading to
> all sorts of problem...
>
> [1]
> http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-October/006035.html
>
--
*Bernard Vatant
*Knowledge Engineering
----------------------------------------------------
*Mondeca**
*3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com>
----------------------------------------------------
Tel: +33 (0) 871 488 459
Mail: bernard.vatant at mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant at mondeca.com>
Blog: Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>
More information about the Wg
mailing list