[TagCommons-WG] Face-to-Face Tag Commons Gathering at the Identity Workshop

[Kevin Marks]

I'll be at the dinner tonight too, woudl liek to catch up.

On 5/15/07, Tom Gruber <onto at tomgruber.org> wrote:
>
> Yikes, I just got the message now (5:30pm) and missed the meeting
> today!%$#
>
> But I will be at the dinner tonight.  Can others make this?
>
> Thanks for organizing this Thomas.
> Tom
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wg-bounces at tagcommons.org [mailto:wg-bounces at tagcommons.org] On
> > Behalf Of Thomas Vander Wal
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:48 PM
> > To: Harry Halpin
> > Cc: Tag Commons Working Group
> > Subject: Re: [TagCommons-WG] Face-to-Face Tag Commons Gathering at the
> > Identity Workshop
> >
> > I ran an overview session with feedback on the metadata
> needed/considered
> > valuable around tagging.
> >
> > I will post the notes, via e-mail, this afternoon.
> >
> > This evening their is an IIW dinner at Monte Carlo in Mountain View, CA
> (228
> > Castro) at 7pm.  I have interest in meeting up and having F2F there
> and/or
> > following.
> >
> > I am also looking at doing a recap and further discussion tomorrow
> morning
> > at the IIW. I am around in the Bay Area through tomorrow evening.
> >
> >
> > On 5/15/07 12:30 PM, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin at ibiblio.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm unfortunately not going to be there, but I it would be great if
> > > someone could post notes and send the notes out.
> > >
> > > My opinion is pretty simple - we do both an API and a common XML/JSON
> > > serialization for results, with a GRDDL to RDF. Rel-tag and xfolk
> should
> > > be some basic subset, and we can then make GRDDL transforms for both
> > > rel-tag and xfolk. Ideally, we should have like 2 or 3 different
> layers,
> > > as long as the layers have different purposes. For example, the
> simplest
> > > layer should probably just be a rel-tag and xfolk mapping, with the
> > > second layer adding much-needed additional contextual info like
> > > application context, and a third layer adding maybe rules or such for
> > > integration.
> > >
> > > Re scheduling, this month I'm pretty busy figuring out how to update
> the
> > > vCard model for RDF, but as soon as that's over with (about a month),
> > > I'll move my focus to TagCommons.
> > >
> > > Nitin Borwankar wrote:
> > >> Kevin Marks wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> I'm in  a course at work this morning, but I'll come down this
> > >>> afternoon if you want to talk microformats then.
> >
> >
> > All the best,
> > Thomas
> >
> > --
> > Work: www.infocloudsolutions.com
> > Work blog: www.personalinfocloud.com
> > Personal: www.vanderwal.net
> >
> > Mobile/Work: +1 703.298.3344
> > Skype: tjvanderwal
> > AIM: vanderwal
> > YahooIM: tjvanderwal
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WG mailing list
> > WG at tagcommons.org
> > http://lists.tagcommons.org/listinfo.cgi/wg-tagcommons.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> WG mailing list
> WG at tagcommons.org
> http://lists.tagcommons.org/listinfo.cgi/wg-tagcommons.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tagcommons.org/pipermail/wg-tagcommons.org/attachments/20070515/699cae80/attachment-0004.htm>